Colonialism and Self-Sufficiency – Russell Means Speaks Out

July 17, 2009 by admin1  
Filed under Featured, Genocide

colonialism

This is a short history of colonization of the Lakotah to explain why our people do not make efforts at self-sufficiency.

1.  The United States outlawed our religion, our spirituality.  Outlawed it.  Out people were sent to prison if they caught practicing our ways.

2.  They rounded up our children, all of our children, for over 80 years and forced them into government and religious boarding schools.  These utilized corporal punishment and mental and physical torture.  They worked to erradicate our language and our songs.  To forcefully teach us that our parents and grandparents were nothing more than stupid, savage pagans.  That education goes on today.

3.  The Constitution of the United States of America does not apply to any American Indian living on an federally recognized American Indian Reservation in the united states.  Therefore we haven’t any Constitutional protections against anyone or anything.  We are not permitted on the reservation to econmically develop.  Hence, our over 80% unemployment.  We cannot test our water officially for uranium poisoning or arsenic poisoning or any other type of minerals or heavy metals.  We can test for E Coli & harmful bacteria.  We are ‘allowed’ 4 tests for those items.

4. We suffer under the agriculture’s department’s starchy food program which is dispersed to us on a monthly basis.  The alledged 10s of 100s of millions of dollars spent on the Lakotah is actually not spent on us.  We are allowed to touch it, as it flies through the reservation to the white man that surrounds us.  We are permitted to own gas stations and convenience stores, where most people shop.  We have one grocery store on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, which is directly across the street from where the Bureau of Indian Affairs and nearby where Indian Health Service Hosptial employees work.

5. We have one Catholic High School, one Bureau of Indian Affairs High School, and two Tribally Controlled/BIA/No Child Left Behind High Schools.  over 95% of the High School students have expressed the desire and the intention to leave the reservation as soon as possible.  We have the Oglala Lakotah College, whose curriculum is designed to encourage graduates to leave the reservation.  After over 80 years of these policies they have successfully destroyed our families, and our communities.  Our entire culture is on the brink of extinction.  The vast majority who remain on the reservation have crushingly low self esteem and no will to better themselves.  The Christian Churches are vultures feeding off the carcases of our poverty.  And they are very rich.

This list is a microcosm of the colonial and genocidal tactics fostered and developed by the government of the United States of America.  For the above reasons and more is why we are asking for investment into our children, and investment in our self-determination.  We welcome all opportunities for individuals to assist and lend their efforts to counter these effects and improve the conditions our people are struggling against.

~Russell Means

Weekend Update #14: White Justice

May 4, 2009 by admin1  
Filed under Commentaries

Russell Means Discusses the 51-month sentencing of Timothy Hotz, a man convicted for 3 prior DUI offenses who drunkenly killed two 20 year old Indians on Pine Ridge, while an Indian gets 3 years for shooting the radiator of a BIA vehicle.

Ward Churchill Vindicated

April 24, 2009 by admin1  
Filed under News

On April 2nd, 2009, A jury returned a decision stating that Ward Churchill had been wrongfully fired from his position as a tenured professor at Colorado University. The cause stemmed from the publication of his now infamous essay ‘The Ghosts of 9-1-1: Reflections on History, Justice and Roosting Chickens’. After its initial publication, three years passed until a section of the esay entitled ‘Some People Push Back’ was brought to light by a college newspaper reporter that the essay came under public criticism and caused the circumstances under which Churchill was subsequently fired.

In the full text, Churchill contends that the events of September 11th, 2001 were made inevitable by a foreign policy that puts the rights of corporations inexorably in front of the rights of people, histories or environments, and that the systemic amnesia engendered and perpetuated within the system is its own form of culpability.

Citing the failures of popular movements to cease the sanctions in Iraq during the 1990s, abolish the WTO or its colluding powers at the IMF/World Bank, he charges the left with acquiescing to state powers in deference to that which is comfortable and secure. The phrase, ‘Little Eichmans’ is largely credited for having drawn attention to the essay, a curious objection as the phrase itself was borrowed from a John Zerzan article, published in 1997.

The jury found for Churchill’s suit and held CU liable for the costs of his legal team and an additional one dollar.

The proceedings come at a time of increased scrutinity of college professors. From Norman Finkelstein’s being denied tenure, to Dr. Cornell West’s somewhat fiery departure from Harvard for Princeton, the high halls of academia have held witness to more power struggles than usual of late. The common thread underlying them all though would seem to be a charge of anti-zionism leveled at all the actors involved here. Finkelstein wrote ‘Beyond Ghutspa: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History’ and West chose to leave Harvard after a public row with Larry Summers, a man who equates Anti-Zionism, the refusal of the State of Israel to exist, and Anti-Semitism, the racist bigotry towards a Jewish person. All three, Churchill, Finkelstein and West are all outspoken critics of US Foreign policy, vis-a-vis Palestine. All three have faced massive scrutiny that others in their fields are hardly ever subject to.

The case in point, Churchill was a tenured professor, but was abruptly demonized at the hint of equivalency of complicity of those who oversaw speculative investing and those who who punched tickets for Auschwitz victims. To be sure, there is a very real difference between the two, but what of those who ran the books for the SS? What of those who currently oversee the World Bank funding of dams that have flooded out perhaps 60 million people in India. Tens of thousands of these were farmers who have now committed suicide. What of the one million farmers displaced by US agribusiness in Mexico in the last 8 years who have no choice but to leave their villages and either enter a sweatshop or take the uncertain road north? The US does not send any of these people to be incinerated, but what level of collusion is acceptably equivalent? At what point will the American or even the progressive voices in America cease being voices and become actions in solidarity against such practices? Until Americans, and in particular those Americans who know something is wrong, answer this question, there will continue to be rhetoric, but no response, and the chickens are still out in the field, waiting to come home.

For Churchill, he has been proved triumphant against the school system that fired him. Unrelenting, he is now seeking the school to either reinstate him or award him one million dollars in damages. A Denver District Court Judge will decide within 30 days of the ruling whether additional damages will be awarded.

Weekend Update #12 – Self Esteem

March 22, 2009 by Russell Means Freedom  
Filed under Commentaries

This week Russell talks to us about self-esteem and how important it is that we rebuild a strong sense of self-worth in the Children now growing up on the Reservations. We are given a first-hand glimpse of how the charitable act of one man really made the day for some kids here at the Porcupine School. He also illustrates the two-faced nature of our sicko, wacked-out USA Government by revealing how the fabulous “new school” is just a fascist coverup for what really goes on here on the Pine Ridge Sioux Indian Reservation.

CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO

Former Colorado Governor Caught Lying Under Oath – Churchill Trial Update

March 14, 2009 by Russell Means Freedom  
Filed under News

Churchill v. University of Colorado:

The (Former) Governor
Takes the Stand

by J. Robert Brown

Former Governor Bill Owens was on the stand for a couple of hours. Not long after the 9/11 essay surfaced, the Governor called on CU to fire Churchill.

David Lane’s main point was to show that the Governor, with line item veto authority over the University of Colorado, applied pressure to get the University to fire Ward Churchill.

The jury heard the former president of CU, Betsy Hoffman, describe a conversation with the Governor where she said he told her to fire Ward Churchill “tomorrow,” that his tone was “threatening,” and that if she didn’t he would “unleash his plan.”

Governor Owens did not specifically recall the conversation but doubted that it was not “in that tenor” and that he did not have a “plan.”

Later, when a partial transcript of an interview on the O’Reilly Factor was put up on the screen, Lane pointed to an exchange where Owens denied he had the authority to fire Churchill but then admitted: “I do have some budget authority over the budget.” Owens declined to admit that this was a threat, noting that its a true statement and repeated over and over that he had actually raised the CU budget during his administration.

On recross, Lane asked whether in fact Governor Owens had a “strategy” for CU if Churchill wasn’t fired. He answered in the negative. Lane then pointed to this exchange on the O’Reilly transcript:

  • O’REILLY: One more question for you. You have basically a strategy, and I want to get this right. You’re not going to pay him off, so he’s not going to get the big bucks. You’re going to go through the lengthy process to prove that he did something that you can legitimately fire him [for], and then he goes — “See you.”
  • OWENS: That’s exactly right. That’s exactly right. That process is starting. I think it will ultimately result in him being fired.

The quick denial followed by the reference in the O’Reilly Factor caused a slight stir in the courtroom. Governor Owens then repeated that he didn’t have a strategy and that he was merely acknowledging that based on the evidence that he knew, there was sufficient basis to fire Churchill.

Governor Owens did acknowledge in his testimony that he was glad the University had not heeded his advice and fired Churchill immediately after the 9/11 essay surface.

Daylight ‘Savings’ Time ?

March 10, 2009 by Russell Means Freedom  
Filed under News

When told the reason for daylight saving time the old Indian said…
‘Only a white man would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket and sew it to the bottom of a blanket and have a longer blanket.’

Next Page »